Case LawHigh Court › Ita/168/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/168/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax, Kottayamn v. M/S.hindustan Newsprint Ltd

High Court 23 May 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/168/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax, Kottayamn v. M/S.hindustan Newsprint Ltd
Date of order
23 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/168/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax, Kottayamn v. M/S.hindustan Newsprint Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Consequently, thisIncome Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 ITA.No. 168 of 2001() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN COCH. IN ITA.558/1996 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT / APPELLANT -------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT RESPONDENT(S): / RESPONDENT --------------- M/S.HINDUSTAN NEWS PRINT LTD., NEWS PRINT NAGAR, VELLOOR. ADV. . SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. ---------------------------------- I.T.A. No.168 of 2001 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 23[rd] day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Question raised in the appeal pertains to disallowance ofguest house expenses and depreciation allowed by both theappellate authorities. Admittedly, the respondent's industrial unit is located ina remote area, where there is no hotel facility available.Further the respondent is a Government of India undertaking.Therefore, we do not find any ground to interfere with theorders of the Tribunal allowing the claim. Consequently, thisIncome Tax Appeal is dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE) jg
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan