Ita/1687/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.malayala Manorama Co.ltd.,Kottayam
High Court
10 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1687/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.malayala Manorama Co.ltd.,Kottayam
Date of order
10 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/1687/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Kottayam v. M/S.malayala Manorama Co.ltd.,Kottayam, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/20TH JYAISHTA, 1938
ITA.No. 1687 of 2009 ( )
-------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 297/COCH/2001 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHINBENCH DATED 10-02-2009APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT::------------------------
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT::
-------------------------
M/S.MALAYALA MANORAMA CO. LTD.,
KOTTAYAM.
R, BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR R, BY ADV. SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI R, BY ADV. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS R, BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPINATH R, BY ADV. SRI.RAJA KANNAN
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-06-2016,ALONG WITH ITA.84/10 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
-----------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
Counsel for the Revenue submits that they are notpursuing these appeals in view of Circular No.21/2015issued by the CBDT.
In view of the submission so made, these appealsare dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge.
Sd/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge.
kkb.
/True copy/
PS to Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.