Ita/1689/2009 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Trichur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur
High Court
02 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1689/2009 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Trichur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur
Date of order
02 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1689/2009 Of The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Trichur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Trichur, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Issue: The question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified insustaining levy of interest under Section 234B(4) of the I.T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2009 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1931
ITA.No. 1689 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.40/COCH/2008 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD,
TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR.
ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVIN BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 02/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The question raised is whether the Tribunal was justified insustaining levy of interest under Section 234B(4) of the I.T. Actpursuant to rectification of assessment under Section 154 of the Act.We have heard Sri. P. Balakrishan, counsel appearing for the appellantand standing counsel appearing for the respondent. We have todaydisposed of connected appeal of the very same assessee, I.T.A.No.1611 of 2009, wherein we have upheld similar levy of interest underSection 234B(3) pursuant to reassessment completed under Section147. In our view the reasoning given in the said judgment squarelyapplies to the facts of this case as well. Besides this, proceedings underSection 154 is squarely covered by Section 234B(4) of the Act andtherefore pursuant to rectification carried under the said provision, theOfficer is bound to levy interest in the short fall of advance tax underSection 234B(3). We are also of the view that if there is failure to
charge interest under Section 234B(1) in the regular assessment, whichis mandatory in nature, such omission itself could be made up inSection 154 proceedings through rectification of assessment. Wetherefore dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
(V.K. MOHANAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.