Ita/170/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Chandigarh v. M/S Ch Lekh Raj Education! & Charitable Trust >
High Court
01 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/170/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Chandigarh v. M/S Ch Lekh Raj Education! & Charitable Trust >
Date of order
01 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/170/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Chandigarh v. M/S Ch Lekh Raj Education! & Charitable Trust >, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes/No2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
FSR S
ITA No.170 of 2016 (O&M)Date of Decision: 01.10.2018
FSR S
Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Chandigarh
...Appellant
VS|
M/s Ch Lekh Raj Education! & Charitable Trust >... Respondent|KK O
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Surya Kant
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sudip Ahluwalia
FE SE
Present:Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr.Advocate withMr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent|Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondent|
FE SE
SURYA KANT J. (Oral)
(1)Learned counsel for Revenue states that the tax effect involved|in this case 1s<40.97 lac and in view of the recent Circular No.3/2018 dated|11.07.2018 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue,Central Board Direct Taxes, the tax effect being less thana50 lacs, he does|not want to press this appeal on merits. ©
(2)In view of the CBDT Circular, the instant appeal is dismissedas not pressed. As prayed for by learned counsel for the appellant, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal, if need be, in thechanged circumstances. The question of law is also kept open. |
(Surya Kant)
Judge
01.10.2018|(Sudip Ahluwalia)vishal shonkarJudge
1. Whether speaking/reasoned?Yes/No2. Whether reportable? |Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.