Case LawHigh Court › Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tvm v. M/S.aswamedh Enterprises

High Court 11 Mar 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tvm v. M/S.aswamedh Enterprises
Date of order
11 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tvm v. M/S.aswamedh Enterprises, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: We,therefore, dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2009 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1930 ITA.No. 171 of 2008() --------------------- ITA.583/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT: -------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- M/S.ASWAMEDH ENTERPRISES, PARAMESWAR NAGAR, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) FOR R1 SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL FOR R1 SRI.K.C.KIRAN FOR R1 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.171 of 2008 .................................................................... Dated this the 11th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Even though the question raised in the appeal filed by theRevenue stands decided against the assessee, the Supreme Courtdeclared the position after the proceedings completed under Section154. In other words, the matter was not free from controversy and itwas still a debatable issue as the on the date of rectification. Even ifappeal is allowed and matter remanded to the Tribunal, there is hardlyany chance of the matter being decided in favour of the Revenue. We,therefore, dismiss the appeal. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge K.SURENDRA MOHANJudge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan