Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tvm v. M/S.aswamedh Enterprises
High Court
11 Mar 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tvm v. M/S.aswamedh Enterprises
Date of order
11 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/171/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tvm v. M/S.aswamedh Enterprises, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: We,therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2009 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1930
ITA.No. 171 of 2008()
---------------------
ITA.583/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
M/S.ASWAMEDH ENTERPRISES,
PARAMESWAR NAGAR, KOLLAM.
ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) FOR R1
SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL FOR R1
SRI.K.C.KIRAN FOR R1
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 11/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.171 of 2008
....................................................................
Dated this the 11th day of March, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Even though the question raised in the appeal filed by theRevenue stands decided against the assessee, the Supreme Courtdeclared the position after the proceedings completed under Section154. In other words, the matter was not free from controversy and itwas still a debatable issue as the on the date of rectification. Even ifappeal is allowed and matter remanded to the Tribunal, there is hardlyany chance of the matter being decided in favour of the Revenue. We,therefore, dismiss the appeal.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
K.SURENDRA MOHANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.