Ita/171/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Brocade Communication
High Court
09 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/171/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Brocade Communication
Date of order
09 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/171/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Brocade Communication, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: THISCOMING|ON,FORADMISSIONTHISDAY,VINEEFT SARAJ.DEBELIVERED THER RFOLLOWIN JUDGMENT The questions involved in this appeal are covered by the|decision of this Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income Tax -vs- Tata Elxi Limited (2012) 349 ITR 98.In the lightof the aforesaid judgment, this appeal sta...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9 DAY QF MARCH 2015|
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND|
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
ITA NO.171/2014
BETWEEN:
1. THR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD,|BANGALORE.C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD,|BANGALORE.
2 "THERE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCQOME-TAXCIRCLE 11(2), RASHTROTHANA BHAVANNRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE.CIRCLE 11(2), RASHTROTHANA BHAVANNRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE.
APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV..,)
AND:
M/S. BROCADE COMMUNICATIONSYSTEMS (P) LTD.,$ FLOOR, PHASE I,VRINDAVAN TRCH VILLAGESEZ SARJAPUR ORR,DEVARABEESANAHALLL, BANGALORE-560 O03.|
RESPONDENT.
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF LT.ACT,1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 25.10.13 PASSED IN ITA.NO.198/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09.
THISCOMING|ON,FORADMISSIONTHISDAY,VINEEFT SARAJ.DEBELIVERED THER RFOLLOWIN
JUDGMENT
The questions involved in this appeal are covered by the|decision of this Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income
Tax -vs- Tata Elxi Limited (2012) 349 ITR 98.In the lightof the aforesaid judgment, this appeal stands|dismissed.
2However, it is submitted by learned counsel for theappellant that against the judgement of this Court, an appeal ts filed
to the Apex Court and 1s pending consideration.
CuIn the event of the Apex Court reversing thejudgement of this Court, the assessing authority shall passconsequential orders in terms of Section 260(1A) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961.
TL
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue