In Ita/17/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun v. Tapovan Resorts, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 1 of 20 22 )**<br>[<br>Appellant has moved the application to seek<br>leave to withdraw the appeal.<br>The application is allowed.<br>The<br>appeal<br>stands<br>dismissed<br>as<br>withdrawan.<br>**( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) ( Vip in San gh i, C.J.)**<br>**04.01.2023**<br>**04.01.2023**<br>_Navin...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders**<br>**or proceedings**<br>**or directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||ITA No. 17 of 2015<br>**Sr i Vipin San gh i, C.J.**<br>**Sr i Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.**<br>Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for<br>the appellant.<br>None appears for the respondent.<br>**W it h draw al Applicat ion ( I .A. No. 1 of 20 22 )**<br>[<br>Appellant has moved the application to seek<br>leave to withdraw the appeal.<br>The application is allowed.<br>The<br>appeal<br>stands<br>dismissed<br>as<br>withdrawan.<br>**( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) ( Vip in San gh i, C.J.)**<br>**04.01.2023**<br>**04.01.2023**<br>_Navin_|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.