Ita/1735/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. South Indian Bank Ltd., Trichur
High Court
07 Oct 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/1735/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. South Indian Bank Ltd., Trichur
Date of order
07 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/1735/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trichur v. South Indian Bank Ltd., Trichur, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The last issue that is liability for interest underSection 234D is also covered by I.T.A.Nos.1714 & 1713 of 2009.Following the above three judgments, this appeal is partlyallowed and partly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.SURENDRA MOHAN
THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932
ITA.No. 1735 of 2009()
----------------------
ITA.139/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
-------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT/ APPELLANT
------------------------
M/S. SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,
SIB HOUSE, THRISSUR.
ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.--------------------------------
I.T.A.No.1735 OF 2009--------------------------------
Dated this the 7[th] day of October, 2010
J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~
C.N.Ramachandran Nair, J.
The first issue raised in the appeal, that is valuation ofunquoted government securities is covered by our decision inassessee's case in I.T.A.No.234/2009 decided today. Followingthe said judgment, we dismiss the revenue's appeal. The 2[nd]issue raised is the claim of loss on the purchase and sale ofsecurity. This issue is covered in favour of the assessee andagainst the revenue by our judgment in I.T.A.No.946/2009 dated9.10.2009. The last issue that is liability for interest underSection 234D is also covered by I.T.A.Nos.1714 & 1713 of 2009.Following the above three judgments, this appeal is partlyallowed and partly dismissed.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)
(K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.