Ita/174/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd
High Court
14 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/174/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
14 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008, 2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/174/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the same reasons, this appeal is also|dismissed| BSV Sd/- JUDGE.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATEKD THIS THE 1[‘T]DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014
PRESENT
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR.
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR|
ITA NO.174 OF 2014
BETWEEN;
1. Commissioner of Income-tax ,Central Revenue BuildingsQueens RoadBangalore 560 OO1-Central Revenue BuildingsQueens RoadBangalore 560 OO1-
”o.. The Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Circle 2(3)CR Buildings, BangaloreCentral Circle 2(3)CR Buildings, Bangalore
_ APPKRLLANTS
(By Sri.E.I. Sanmathi, Advocate)
AND:
M/s. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd.No.6/ 1-4, A Block>[*6]Floor, Bagmane Tech ParkLake View BuildingC.V. Raman NagarBangalore - 560 093
~_ RBSPONDENT.
(By Sri.A. Shankar & M. Lava, Advocates)
-0-0-0-0-O0-
This appeal is filed under Section 260-A of Income TaxAct 1961, arising out of order dated 07/11/2013 passed in|ITA No.346/Bang/2012, for the Assessment year 2007-2008praying to decide the foregoing question of law and / or suchother questions of law as may be formulated by the Hon'bleCourt as deemed fit and set aside the common appellate|order dated 07/11/2013 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, “‘B’ Bench, Bangalore, in appeal proceedings No.ITANo.346/Bang/2012 for Assessment year 2007-08, as sought|for in this appeal.
This appeal coming on for Admission this. day,N.KUMAR, J.delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT
The impugned order is passed in two cases. Againstthe impugned order, the Revenue has preferred ITA)No.175/2014, which>1Sdismissedby thisCOUTT|OT]14.10.2014. For the same reasons, this appeal is also|dismissed|
BSV
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/-.
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.