Case LawHigh Court › Ita/174/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/174/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr Iqbal Ismail Virani

High Court 04 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/174/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr Iqbal Ismail Virani
Date of order
04 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/174/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr Iqbal Ismail Virani, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF MARCH, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR I.T.A.No.174/2022 BETWEEN : 1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095 2 . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TAXATION WARD-1 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION WARD-1 PRESENT ADDRESS:DCIT CIRCLE-2(1), 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) AND :Mr. IQBAL ISMAIL VIRANI VIRANI NIWAS Dr. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, ALTINHO, MAPUSA GOA-403507, PAN: …RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12.03.2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.187/PAN/2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 PRAYING TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.187/PAN/2019 DATED 12.03.2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ANNEXURE-C CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the above appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court. 2. Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted. 3. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. 4. Registry shall return the original documents, if any, to the appellants, keeping photocopies of the same for record purpose. SD/- JUDGE SD/- JUDGE KTY
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan