Case LawHigh Court › Ita/18/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax,...

Ita/18/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Kolkata v. Sheela Devi Agarwalla

High Court 17 Nov 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/18/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Kolkata v. Sheela Devi Agarwalla
Date of order
17 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/18/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-I, Kolkata v. Sheela Devi Agarwalla, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.The substantial questions of law already framed by this Court by orderdated January 24, 2012 are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

O-2 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/18/2012COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I, KOLKATAVS.SHEELA DEVI AGARWALLA BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM AndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 17[th] November, 2022 Appearance :Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv.…for the appellantMr. Saumya Kejriwal, Adv.Mr. G.S. Gupta, Adv.…for the respondent The Court : This appeal at the instance of the revenue under Section 260Aof the Income Tax, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated July 14,2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata in ITANos. 42 to 44 (Kol) of 2011 for the assessment years 2003-04, 2005-06 and2007-08 respectively. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel representing theappellant/revenue, submits that the tax effect in the instant appeal is below thethreshold limit as per the CBDT circular. Such fact has not been disputed by thelearned counsel for the respondent/assessee. In view thereof, the revenue cannot pursue the appeal any further. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.The substantial questions of law already framed by this Court by orderdated January 24, 2012 are left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) SN.AR(CR)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan