Ita/182/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. T Suresh Gowda
High Court
24 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/182/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. T Suresh Gowda
Date of order
24 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/182/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. T Suresh Gowda, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 27 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 |
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.182 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.
C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU,
2 |THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER
WARD-3(4),
C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU,
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND
SHRI T. SURESH GOWDA.NO.65, VANI VILAS ROAD,BASAVANAGUDI,BENGALURU-560 OO4.
(BY SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
RESPONDENT|
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER|DATED 30.12.2009 PASSED IN ITA NO.262/BANG/2009, FOR|THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE|COURT TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF|LAW STATED THEREIN; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE|THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN ITA)NO.262/BANG/2009 DATED 30.12.2009 AND CONFIRM THE|ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THEORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF.INCOME TAX, WARD-3(4), BENGALURU.
OK AK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned counsel for the appellants submit that.the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary|limits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 £=dat08.08.2019 passed by Director (ITJ), Central BoardDirect Taxes, New Delni.
2DIn view of the submission made, the appeal is.
dismissed as such. |
Sd/-JUDGE
JJ
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.