Case LawHigh Court › Ita/182/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/182/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kwality Biscuits Pvt Ltd

High Court 12 Jul 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/182/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kwality Biscuits Pvt Ltd
Date of order
12 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/182/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Kwality Biscuits Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of with liberty to the revenue to revive the same in case occasion so arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF JULY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR I.T.A.NO.182OF2012 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX C.R. BUILDING C.R. BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE. BANGALORE. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-11(5) C.R. BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE. CIRCLE-11(5) C.R. BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. KWALITY BISCUITS PVT., LTD., P.B. NO.3902 6 MILE, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE – 560 039. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. R. JAWAHARHAL, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.01.2012 PASSED IN ITA No.1223/BANG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-02, PRAYING TO: i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN; ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BNAGALORE IN ITA NO.1223/BANG/2009 DATED:31.01.2021 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(5), BANGALORE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS ALOK ARADHE, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DAY, JUDGMENT Sri.E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for Sri.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Sri.R.Jawaharlal, learned counsel for the assessee. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee had applied under “Vivad Se Vishwas” scheme. Further, Form No.3 has been issued to the assessee. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. The appeal is disposed of with liberty to the revenue to revive the same in case occasion so arises. Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE JUDGE bnv
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan