Ita/184/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr R Srinivasan
High Court
19 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/184/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr R Srinivasan
Date of order
19 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/184/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Mr R Srinivasan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUON THE 19 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018.
BEFORE.
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND|
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.184 OF 2008
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD|BENGALURU,C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD|BENGALURU,
2).THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-15(2), BENGALURU.WARD-15(2), BENGALURU.
_.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND"
MR.R.SRINIVASAN
NO.30, PUSHPA NILAYA|11 MAIN, SHIVANAGAR.
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 O10. ... RESPONDENT|
THIS INCOMETAXAPPEAL|[S|FILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING|TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW;|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSEDBY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU|‘A’ BENCH, IN ITA NO.567/BANG/2007 DATED 14.09.2007
AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX.OFFICER, WARD 15(2), BENGALURU AND TO PASS SUCH)OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON BLE COURT|DEEMSFLT.TO)GRANT|IN|THE|FACTSANDCIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF.JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
AK AK
THIS INCOME JAK APPEAL COMING ON FOR|ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE|FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit that
the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary|limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated.
11.07.2018 passed by Director (I1TJ), Central Board Direct
Taxes, New Delni.
2).In view of the submission made, the appeal is
cismissed as SUC)N.
Sd/- |
JUDGE |
*pgn/-|
Sd/-|
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.