Case LawHigh Court › Ita/186/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/186/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Jalajakshi B Hegde

High Court 02 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/186/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Jalajakshi B Hegde
Date of order
02 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/186/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Jalajakshi B Hegde, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATEBD THIS THR [nd]DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014. PRESENT THR HON' BLE MR. JUSTICK N.KUMAR AND THR HON' BLE MR. JUSTICK B. MANOHAR INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1860/200 BERITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, C.R. Building,| AttavaraMangalore.Mangalore. a2The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Income Tax Investigation Circle,Mangalore._. APPBELLANTSIncome Tax Investigation Circle,Mangalore._. APPBELLANTS (BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) AND: omt. Jalajakshi B. Hegde,W/o M. Balakrishna Hegde,‘Gokul’ Shivbagh Main Road,Near 4[5(]Cross,Kadri,Mangalore. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI A. SHANKAR & M. LAVA, ADVOCATES) This ITA is filed under Section VJ6O0O-A of tIncome Tax Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated1.12.2008 passed in IT(SS)A No. 139/BNG/2003, forthe assessment year 1.4.1989 to 28.6.1999 praying toformulate the substantial questions of law statedtherein and to allow the appeal and set aside the orderpassedby theITATBangalore|1nNTT(SS)A No.139/BNG/2003, dated 1.12.2008 and confirm theorder passed by the Assessing Authority in the interestof justice and equity. This Income Tax Appeal coming on for Hearingthis day, N. Kumar J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT The revenue has preferred this appeal challengingthe order passed by the Tribunal. 2. The revenue has not challenged the additionsdeleted by the Tribunal and are not the subject matterof this appeal. The net tax effect which is the subjectmatter of this appeal is Rs.55,710/-. In view of CircularNo.2/2005, the appeal is not maintainable as it is lessthan Rs.4,00,000/-. Therefore, the appeal is dismissedon the ground of monitory tax limit. od/-Judge od/-/Judge Nsu/-.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan