Case LawHigh Court › Ita/187/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/187/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm v. M/S.universal Trust

High Court 08 Sep 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/187/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm v. M/S.universal Trust
Date of order
08 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/187/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Tvm v. M/S.universal Trust, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The question raised is whether the Tribunal wasjustified in confirming the order of the First AppellateAuthority holding that the respondent being a CharitableInstitution is entitled to exemption.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 17TH BHADRA 1932 ITA.No. 187 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.353/COCH/2007 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT:APPELLANT: ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- M/S. UNIVERSAL TRUST,NEAR PRESS CLUB ROAD, OTTUKUZHI,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.KUMAR THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ------------------------------------------- I.T. Appeal No.187 of 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8[th] September, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard the Standing counsel for the appellant and Adv.A.Kumar appearing for the respondent. 2. The question raised is whether the Tribunal wasjustified in confirming the order of the First AppellateAuthority holding that the respondent being a CharitableInstitution is entitled to exemption. We find that on facts,the Tribunal found that 78% of the income is shown by theassessee as expenditure for charitable purposes during therelevant year. Further, the respondent Trust enjoyedexemption as a charitable institution based on registrationgranted by the commissioner which was also notwithdrawn. We do not find any question of law arisingfrom the order of the Tribunal. Consequently, the appealis dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan