Case LawHigh Court › Ita/187/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/187/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S 3D Networks Pte Ltd

High Court 29 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/187/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S 3D Networks Pte Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/187/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S 3D Networks Pte Ltd, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: With such liberty as sought for by learned counsel for Revenue, the appeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA ITA NO.187/2018 BETWEEN: 1 . PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 BMTC COMPLEX, BMTC COMPLEX, KORMANGALA, BANGALORE. 2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-12(5) BANGALORE. INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-12(5) BANGALORE. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI: JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE) AND: M/s. 3D NETWORKS PTE LTD INDIA BRANCH SINCE MERGED WITH M/s. WIPRO LIMITED, DODDAKANNELLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025 PAN:AAACZ 1236A ...RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 18.04.2017 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN IT(TP)A NO.622/BANG/2011 FOR A.Y. 2003-2004 & GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned counsel for appellants- Revenue. 2. Learned counsel for Revenue submits that the addition in the case is less than Rs.1 crore and in view of the monetary limits prescribed in Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019, the appeal is not maintainable and hence he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to make a prayer for restoration, if occasion so arises. With such liberty as sought for by learned counsel for Revenue, the appeal is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE *mn/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan