Ita/187/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Hindusthan
High Court
14 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/187/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Hindusthan
Date of order
14 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015, 2015-2016
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/187/2022 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. M/S Hindusthan, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in ITA No.186/2022, these appeals stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
I.T.A NO.187 of 2022
C/W
I.T.A No.188 OF 2022
I.T.A NO.187 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 INCOME TAX-3
BMTC COMPLEX KORAMANGALA BANGALORE. KORAMANGALA BANGALORE.
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(2), BMTC COMPLEX KORMANGALA 6 BLOCK BENGALURU. OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(2), BMTC COMPLEX KORMANGALA 6 BLOCK BENGALURU.
.…APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI. SANMATHI E.I, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/s HINDUSTHAN
AERONAUTICS LTD., NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 PAN: NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 PAN:
2. MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001
3. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS III FLOOR, 'C' WING LOK NAYAK BHAWAN KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI - 110003. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS III FLOOR, 'C' WING LOK NAYAK BHAWAN KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI - 110003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY Ms. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE AS AMICUS CURIAE) SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE AS AMICUS CURIAE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 24/08/2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.84/BANG/2018 AND C.O.29/BANG/2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015, PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS FIT AND ETC.
I.T.A NO.188 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX-3
BMTC COMPLEX KORAMANGALA BANGALORE. KORAMANGALA BANGALORE.
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 3(1)(2), BMTC COMPLEX
KORMANGALA 6 BLOCK BENGALURU BENGALURU
.…APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI. SANMATHI E.I, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/s HINDUSTHAN AERONAUTICS LTD., NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 PAN: AERONAUTICS LTD., NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 PAN:
2. MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110 001
3. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS III FLOOR, 'C' WING LOK NAYAK BHAWAN KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI - 110003. …RESPONDENTS DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS III FLOOR, 'C' WING LOK NAYAK BHAWAN KHAN MARKET NEW DELHI - 110003. …RESPONDENTS
(BY Ms. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE AS AMICUS CURIAE) SHRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE AS AMICUS CURIAE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 24/08/2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.2492/BANG/2018 AND C.O.30/BANG/2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016, PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS FIT AND ETC.
THESE INCOME TAX APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri E.I.Sanmathi, learned Standing Counsel for the appellants and Ms. Tanmayee Rajkumar, learned advocate for respondent No.1 jointly submit that the issues involved in these appeals are similar to ITA No.186/2022.
2. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in ITA No.186/2022, these appeals stand dismissed.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
AV
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.