Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. Corporate Ispat Alloy Ltd.,Nagpur
High Court
20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. Corporate Ispat Alloy Ltd.,Nagpur
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. Corporate Ispat Alloy Ltd.,Nagpur, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: P.C. : 1.This application was admitted on 17[th ]April, 1998 on the following question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT (A) and in allowing relief u/s.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.19 OF 1993
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders ofdirections and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr.K.P. Dewani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C. :
1.This application was admitted on 17[th ]April, 1998 on the following question of law.
“Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT (A) and in allowing relief u/s. 80HH & 80-I of the Act for A.Y. 90-91 ?”
2.The question raised in this
application is, whether the activity of cutting
and breaking of the big boulders into small pieces by mechanical process amounts to manufacture. The Tribunal has relied upon its decision in the case of M/s.Bhilai Iron Foundary (I) Limited.
3.The question, whether the activity carried on by the assessee is a manufacturing activity is a question of law.
4.Accordingly, the application is allowed. The Tribunal is directed to forward the statement of case as expeditiously as possible.
Judge
Judge.
/agk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.