Case LawHigh Court › Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. Corporate Ispat Alloy Ltd.,Nagpur

High Court 20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. Corporate Ispat Alloy Ltd.,Nagpur
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/19/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. Corporate Ispat Alloy Ltd.,Nagpur, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: P.C. : 1.This application was admitted on 17[th ]April, 1998 on the following question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT (A) and in allowing relief u/s.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.19 OF 1993 Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders ofdirections and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Applicant.Mr.K.P. Dewani, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. : 1.This application was admitted on 17[th ]April, 1998 on the following question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in setting aside the orders of the Assessing Officer and CIT (A) and in allowing relief u/s. 80HH & 80-I of the Act for A.Y. 90-91 ?” 2.The question raised in this application is, whether the activity of cutting and breaking of the big boulders into small pieces by mechanical process amounts to manufacture. The Tribunal has relied upon its decision in the case of M/s.Bhilai Iron Foundary (I) Limited. 3.The question, whether the activity carried on by the assessee is a manufacturing activity is a question of law. 4.Accordingly, the application is allowed. The Tribunal is directed to forward the statement of case as expeditiously as possible. Judge Judge. /agk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan