Case LawHigh Court › Ita/193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.page Industries Ltd

High Court 17 Dec 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.page Industries Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/193/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.page Industries Ltd, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU DATBD THIS THR 17 DAY OF DECEMBER, 20109 PRESENT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN| AND THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA ITA No. 193/2010 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, © BANGALORE. | ”2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE- 12(2), C.R. BUILDING, |CIRCLE- 12(2), C.R. BUILDING, | QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. | .. APPELLANTS| (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND & MS. PREETHI.J.D-ADVs) | AND M/S PAGE INDUSTRIES LTD.,NO. 6/2 & 6/4, HONGASANDRA,JOCKEY CAMPUS, BEGUR HOBLI,BANGALORE-560 O68. .. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ASSHANKAR & SRI. M.LAVA-ADVs)_ THIS ITA IS FILED U/S 260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 PRAYING|TO SET ASDIE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALOREIN ITA NO.564/BNG/2009 DATED 11.12.2009, ETC. THIS TTA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue hasplaced before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated|10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes,wherein the monetary limit of the tax eftect for filing appealsbefore the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |Rs.20 lacs. before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to | In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has beenclarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending|appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may bewithdrawn/not pressed. 2.Learned counsel for the appellants has stated|that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specifiedlimit of Rs.20 lacs. 3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal standsdismissed. TL Sd/-.JUDGE| Sd/-. JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan