Case LawHigh Court › Ita/193/2011 Of Amadeus It Group Sa v. T...

Ita/193/2011 Of Amadeus It Group Sa v. The Director Of Income Tax

High Court 24 Jan 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/193/2011 Of Amadeus It Group Sa v. The Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/193/2011 Of Amadeus It Group Sa v. The Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 1542/2011 In view of the aforesaid orders in appeals, ai l the pendingACMS stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

% 24.01.2011 Present: Mr. Ajay Vohra with Ms. Somnath Shukia and Mr. SomnathShukia, Advocates for the assessee. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel for theRevenue. (COMMON ORDER) + ITA Nos.191. 192. 193/2011 The only issue raised in these appeals which are filed bythe same assessee but for the different assessment years is as towhether the assessee is running permanent establishment in India ornot. We find that all the Authorities below, after taking intoconsideration various facts, have arrived at the finding of fact that theassessee is having permanent establishment in India. This being afinding of fact, no question of law arises. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. CM Nos.1538. 1539. 1540. 1541. 1542/2011 In view of the aforesaid orders in appeals, ai l the pendingACMS stand dismissed. K. SIKRI, J. M.L. MEHTA, J. JANUARY 24, 2011 pmc Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed By:AMULYACertify that the digital file andphysical file have been compared andthe digital data is as per the physicalfile and no page is missing. \i
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan