Ita/193/2018 Of M/S. Eads India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/193/2018 Of M/S. Eads India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/193/2018 Of M/S. Eads India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in.terms of the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATKBD THIS THE 2 DAY OF MAY, 2019
PRESEBNT
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK L.INARAYANA SWAMY
ANT)
THR HON’BLEB MR. JUSTICK R.DEVDAS
I.T.A. No.193/2018
BETWEEN:
M/S EADS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED(NOW KNOWN AS AIRBUS GROUPINDIA PRIVATE LIMITED)C-9, TERI UNIVERSITY CAMPUSPLOT NO.10, IHC INSTITUTE AREA|VASANT KUNJ, DELHI 110 070 |
ALSO HAVING OFFICE AIT& FLOOR, XYLEM PLOT NO.4 & 4A_DYAVASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA|MAHADBVAPU RA POSTWHITE FIELD ROADBRENGALORU 560 048... APPELLANT
(BY SMT. ANURADHA AGNIHOTRI, ADV.)
AND:
BARLIER AT:DBPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMB TAXCIRCLE-11(1) C.R. BUILDINGNEW DELHI 110 OO2.
NOW BRFORE:DBPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMB TAXCIRCLE-1(1) BMTC BUILDING|SO FEBT ROAD 6[‘L]BLOCK KORAMANGALABENGALURU 560 095).. RESPONDENT.
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND AND SRI DILIP M. ADVS.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [S FILED UNDER SECILION2600-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDERDATE 17.10.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP)A No.95/BANG/2016 (VIDE.ANNEXURE-A) FOR THE ASSESSEMENT YEAR 2011-2012.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,NARAYANA SWAMY, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for appellant seeks leave of this.Court to withdraw the appeal. He has also filed a memo|dated 28.05.2019 to the said effect. The memo is placed on |record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in.terms of the memo.
SD/-|JUDGE
SD/-|
JUDGE.
HR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue