Case LawHigh Court › Ita/194/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Ita/194/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. State Bank Of Patiala

High Court 22 May 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/194/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. State Bank Of Patiala
Date of order
22 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/194/2017 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala v. State Bank Of Patiala, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CM No. 11681-CII of 2017 in/andITA No. 194 of 2017 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH. CM No. 11681-CII of 2017 in/andITA No. 194 of 2017 (O&M)Date of Decision : 22.05.2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala ...Appellant 5)/+6+ State Bank of Patiala ...Respondent CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL Present:Mr. Z.S. Klar, Advocate for the appellant, Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.M. Monga, Advocatefor the respondent. *K S.J. VAZIF DAR, C.J.(Oral CM No. 1168%CHT of 2017 Application is allowed and documents as Annexures R-1 to R-3 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. ITA No. 194 of2017 This is an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench, Chandigarh in respect of assessment year 2010- 2011. It is admitted that the question of law raised in this appeal iscovered against the appellant/department and in tavour of the assessee/respondent by the judgment of this Court, dated 27.02.2017(Annexure R-2) in the case of these very parties in ITA No. 270 of 2016. The question of law is, therefore, decided against the appellant, Mr. Klar, learned counsel for the appellant states that theappellant has challenged that judgment before the Supreme Court. (S.J. VAZIFDAR)CHIEF JUSTICE 22.05.2017kanchan (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)JUDGE. Whether speaking/reasoned?Whether reportable? Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan