Case LawHigh Court › Ita/197/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/197/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S.chandragiri Construction Co.kasarago

High Court 04 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/197/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S.chandragiri Construction Co.kasarago
Date of order
04 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/197/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. M/S.chandragiri Construction Co.kasarago, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON THURSDAY ,THE 04TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018 / 12TH ASWINA, 1940 ITA.No. 197 of 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 831/2008 ofI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 31-05-2011 APPELLANT/S: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL),COCHIN. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)SRI.JOSE JOSEPH SC FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/S: M/S.CHANDRAGIRI CONSTRUCTION CO.THEKKIL P.O., KASARAGOD - 671 541. BY ADVS.SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATHSRI.ANIL D. NAIRSRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.10.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Vinod Chandran, J. JUDGMENT The learned Standing Counsel, Government of India(Taxes) submits, on instructions, that the Revenue may bepermitted to withdraw the appeal on the basis of thelitigation policy framed by the Central Board of DirectTaxes. Hence, the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn,leaving open the questions of law. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRANJUDGE Sd/- ASHOK MENONJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan