Case LawHigh Court › Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt L...

Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 19 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file an appeal if need arises in future.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA BETWEEN: I.T.A.NO.197/2018 M/S SOPLAR (INDIA) PVT. LTD., PHASE – II, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU – 560 058 (REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI.JAGDISH CHANDANI, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, S/O SRI GOBIND SINGH HASSA SINGH CHANDANI) PAN AAMCS 1715 K … APPELLANT (BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 6(1)(2), ROOM NO.242, 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 095. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI DILIP M, ADVOCATE FOR SRI ARAVIND K.V., ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.10.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP) A NO.65/Bang/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) PRAYING TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET- ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ‘C’ BENCH BEARING IN IT(TP) A NO.65/Bang/2017 DATED 13.10.2017 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC., THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The memo for withdrawal of the appeal is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file an appeal if need arises in future. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan