Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/197/2018 Of M/S Soplar (India) Pvt Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file an appeal if need arises in future.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
BETWEEN:
I.T.A.NO.197/2018
M/S SOPLAR (INDIA) PVT. LTD., PHASE – II, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU – 560 058 (REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI.JAGDISH CHANDANI, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, S/O SRI GOBIND SINGH HASSA SINGH CHANDANI) PAN AAMCS 1715 K … APPELLANT
(BY SRI.CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 6(1)(2), ROOM NO.242, 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FT ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 095. … RESPONDENT
(BY SRI DILIP M, ADVOCATE FOR SRI ARAVIND K.V., ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.10.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP) A NO.65/Bang/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) PRAYING TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-
ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU ‘C’ BENCH BEARING IN IT(TP) A NO.65/Bang/2017 DATED 13.10.2017 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC.,
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The memo for withdrawal of the appeal is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file an appeal if need arises in future.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.