Ita/197/2020 Of Pr.commmissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Opto Circuits (India) Ltd
High Court
16 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/197/2020 Of Pr.commmissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Opto Circuits (India) Ltd
Date of order
16 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-2013
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/197/2020 Of Pr.commmissioner Of Income Tax-5 v. M/S Opto Circuits (India) Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is’dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby NARAYANAUMALocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
ANDTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH |INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 197 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1PR.COMMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5BNTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALOREBNTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE
2DTHE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-5(1)(2), BANGALORE.
APPELLANTS|
(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S OPTO CIRCUITS (INDIA) LTDC/O H SHIVA PRASAD REDDY, IRS (RETD)N N YUVRAJ, ASSOCIATES, ‘VISION POINT|NO. 23, 3 FLOORPARK ROAD, OFF QUEENS ROADBANGALORE - 560 O51..
RESPONDENT|
(V/O DTD 20/02/2023BY SRI. NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN,AMICUS CURIAE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2J60-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, PAYING TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED|26/02/2020 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A’|BENCH, BENGALURU, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE'S|CASE,IN|APPEAL|PROCEEDINGSTTA.NO.1044/BANG/2018 (ANNEXURE-'A’) FOR A.Y. 2012-2013.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:51/753-DITA No. 197 of 2020
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAOandHON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)
Mr.Sanmathi E.I., learned counsel for the appellants|Submits that he has an instruction to state as the tax effect in|this appeal is less than Rupees Two Crores, the appeal is notpressed.
The said submission is placed on record.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is’dismissed as not pressed.
JS)List No.: 1 S| No.: 5/7
Sd/-|(V KAMESWAR RAO).JUDGE|
Sd/-|(S RACHAIARH)JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.