Case LawHigh Court › Ita/199/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/199/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax v. Ram Bahadur Thakkur Pvt. Ltd

High Court 05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/199/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax v. Ram Bahadur Thakkur Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/199/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax v. Ram Bahadur Thakkur Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The question raised in the departmental appeal is whether theTribunal is justified in allowing deduction of 50% of income earned bythe assessee in the form of refund of sales tax.

Decision: We accordingly dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929 ITA.No. 199 of 2001() --------------------- ITA.1025/1991 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT : ----------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SC FOR IT SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT RESPONDENTS: ------------- M/S. RAM BAHADUR THAKKUR PVT. LTD., COCHIN BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE SRI.THOMAS VELLAPPALLY THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 199 OF 2001 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair,J. The question raised in the departmental appeal is whether theTribunal is justified in allowing deduction of 50% of income earned bythe assessee in the form of refund of sales tax. While senior counselfor the revenue contended that entire refund is income at the hands ofthe assessee, senior counsel appearing for the respondent-assesseecontended that but for the payment under the agreement the assesseewould not have got refund. We find from the order of the Tribunal thatpayment is made under agreement and obviously without payment andwithout getting documents such as export orders, shipping documents,bills of lading and producing the same the assessee would not have gotrefund. Further, since the amount paid is under agreement 50%allowed as deduction at the hands of the assessee is income in thehands of receipient. Since Tribunal has rendered decision based on finding of facts on this issue, we do not find any ground to reverse theTribunal's order. We accordingly dismiss the appeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan