Ita/199/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S 3G Wireless Communication Pvt Ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/199/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S 3G Wireless Communication Pvt Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/199/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S 3G Wireless Communication Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATBD THIS THR 17 DAY OF DECEMBER, 20109
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN|
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
ITA No.199/2013
l.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IVCENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS,QUEENS ROAD,CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS,QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE -560 OO1.
2.THERE DEPUTLY COMMISSIONER OINCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(4),BANGALORE.INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(4),BANGALORE.
_ APPBRLLANTS)
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI-ADV)|
AND
M/S 3G WIRELESS COMMUNICATION |PVT. LTD, NO.5, GULMOHAR ENCLAVE,KUNDALAHALLI GATE,BANGALORE-560 O37. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ATUL K. ALUR-ADV)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF LT. ACT,|1961 PRAYING TO SBT ASIDE THR COMMON APPBLLATEKORDER OF THE ITAT ‘C’ BENCH, BANGALORE IN ITANO.379/BANG/2012 DATED 04.12.2012.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue hasplaced before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated|10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes,wherein the monetary limit of the tax eftect for filing appealsbefore the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |Rs.20 lacs.
before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |
In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has beenclarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending|appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may bewithdrawn/not pressed.
2.Learned counsel for the appellants has stated|that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specifiedlimit of Rs.20 lacs.
3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal standsdismissed.
TL
Sd/- |
JUDGE|
Sd/-.
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.