Ita/200001/2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. Shri Hingulambika Education Society
High Court
03 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhckalaburagi
Parties
Ita/200001/2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. Shri Hingulambika Education Society
Date of order
03 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/200001/2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another v. Shri Hingulambika Education Society, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby RAMESHMATHAPATILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC-K:9165-DBITA No. JQOO0O0COL1 of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDAS|ANDTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARADA|
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2O0O0Q0O1 OF 2
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, |EXEMPTIONS,EXEMPTIONS,
ROOM NO. 609, 6TH FLOOR,
UNITY BUILDING ANNEXURE,
P. KALINGA RAO ROAD, |
BENGALURU - 560077.
2.THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER,
(EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1, 3 FLOOR,
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, SEDAM ROAD,
KALBURAGI - 585105.
APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. M. THIRUMALESH, ADV.)
AND:
SHRI HINGULAMBIKA EDUCATION SOCIETY,
SY. NO. 55/2, BHAVSAR NAGAR, |
SEDAM ROAD, GULBARGA —- 585106.
KARNATAKA.
PAN: AAFTS 4816F.
RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THEINCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL ANDSET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX|APPELLATETRIBUNAL,BENGALURU|IN|TTANO.1126/BANG/2022 DATED 22.06.2023 FOR ASSESSMENT|YEAR JZOJZO-2071 ANNEXURE-A AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OTHE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER|PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS, WARD-1,_KALABURGI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDASAND
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA|
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)
1.Learned counsel for the appellants nas filed a memo|dated 15.11.2024 stating that consequent to the revisionof monetary limits issued by the Central Board of DirectTaxes for filing of appeals vide Circular No.09/2024 dated17.09.2024, and since the tax effect involved in this case.falls Delow the thresnold monetary limits prescribed in thesaid Circular, the appellants may be permitted to withdrawthe appeal.
2.Tne memo is taken on record subject to all just}exceptions.|
‘3Accordingly,tne|appealstands.dismissed.as
withdrawn.
DHA|List No.: 1 S| No.: 10|CT: PS|
Sd/-|(R.DEVDAS)|JUDGE|
Sd/-|(G BASAVARAJA)JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue