Ita/200/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income Tax v. M/S P.r.kulkarni & Sons (Huf)
High Court
17 Dec 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/200/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income Tax v. M/S P.r.kulkarni & Sons (Huf)
Date of order
17 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/200/2010 Of The Commissiner Of Income Tax v. M/S P.r.kulkarni & Sons (Huf), the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal stands—dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATBD THIS THR 17 DAY OF DECEMBER, 20109
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN|
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
ITA No. 200/2010
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,|
C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE. |
2. THERE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, RANGE-1I, |
MYSORE. |
.. APPELLANT
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND & MS.PREETHI.J.D-ADVs)
AND:
M/S P.R.KULKARNI & SONS (HUF),NO.34/1, 1[S|]MAIN ROAD,YADAVAGIRI CIRCLE,YADAVAGIRI,
MYSORKBE. ... RESPONDENT
(BY SRILA.SHANKAR & SRI.M.LAVA-ADVs)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2Z6O0A OF LT. ACT1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE|ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO. 9569/BANG/2009 DATED:29.1.2010, ETC..
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, |VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue has/placed before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated|10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes,|wherein the monetary limit of the tax eftect for filing appealsbefore the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |Rs.20 lacs.
In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has been)clarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pendingappeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may bewithdrawn/not pressed.
2.Learned counsel for the appellants has stated|that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specifiedlimit of Rs.20 lacs.
3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal stands—dismissed.
TTL
Sd/-.JUDGE|
Sd/-.
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue