Case Law › High Court › Ita/200/2020 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Ita/200/2020 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income - Tax v. Shri.anil H.lad

High Court 27 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

27 Jan 2021

Assessment year(s)

2006-2007

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/200/2020 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income - Tax v. Shri.anil H.lad, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 260A case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA ITA NO.200/2020 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIT (A), CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.ARAVIND K.V., ADV.,) AND: SHRI. ANIL H. LAD, PROP: VSL MINING COMPANY, HOUSE OF LAD, PALACE ROAD, SANDUR, KARNATAKA, PAN: … RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.06.2019 PASSED IN ITA NO.130/Bang/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 04.09.2020 seeking withdrawal of the petition. The prayer is allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE SSD

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.