Case LawHigh Court › Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Chd v. Rajesh Bansal

High Court 23 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Chd v. Rajesh Bansal
Date of order
23 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Chd v. Rajesh Bansal, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH 105 CM-4102-C[[-2021 in/andITA-20-2013 (O&M)Decided on: 23.8.2021 Commissioner of Income Tax -I] ...Appellant VS) Sh. Rajesh Gupta ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present:Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the applicant-respondent. i HK AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral)CM-4102-CI[-2021 This application has been filed for disposal of the main case, It has been stated that assesee having been paid entire tax the appeal has become infructuous, Notice of the application. Mr. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate appears and accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicant/appellant and has admitted that therespondent has paid all the tax dues. For the reasons recorded, the application is allowed. Main caseis taken up for hearing today itselt. ITA-20-2013 In view of the averments made in —CM-4102-CII-2021andas admit by the counsel for the Revenue, the main case 1s dismissed ashaving been rendered infructuous. Since the main case has been decided, the pending application,if any, also stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE(ALKA SARIN)JUDGE”23.82021anuradhaWhether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan