Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Chd v. Rajesh Bansal
High Court
23 Aug 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Chd v. Rajesh Bansal
Date of order
23 Aug 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/20/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Chd v. Rajesh Bansal, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
105
CM-4102-C[[-2021 in/andITA-20-2013 (O&M)Decided on: 23.8.2021
Commissioner of Income Tax -I]
...Appellant
VS)
Sh. Rajesh Gupta
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present:Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate
for the applicant-respondent.
i HK
AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral)CM-4102-CI[-2021
This application has been filed for disposal of the main case,
It has been stated that assesee having been paid entire tax the
appeal has become infructuous,
Notice of the application.
Mr. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate appears and accepts notice on
behalf of the non-applicant/appellant and has admitted that therespondent has paid all the tax dues.
For the reasons recorded, the application is allowed. Main caseis taken up for hearing today itselt.
ITA-20-2013
In view of the averments made in —CM-4102-CII-2021andas
admit by the counsel for the Revenue, the main case 1s dismissed ashaving been rendered infructuous.
Since the main case has been decided, the pending application,if any, also stands disposed of.
(AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE(ALKA SARIN)JUDGE”23.82021anuradhaWhether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.