Case Law › High Court › Ita/202/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/202/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Principal Officer (Cao), M/S Uhbvn Ltd

High Court 08 May 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

08 May 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Ita/202/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Principal Officer (Cao), M/S Uhbvn Ltd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No. 202 of 2011 (O&M)Date of decision:08.05.2014 Commissioner of Income Tax (IDS) Chandigarh .....- Appe Vs, The Principal Officer (CAO)M/s Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula ....mesponden CORAM: HON’?BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTHON BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the revenue-appellant,None for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, For orders, see ITA No.652 of 2010 (Commissioner ofIncomeTax (IDS) Chandigarh v.Dakshin Haryana Byli Vitran Nigam Limited). (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge May 08, 2014<.#: (Jaspal Singh)Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.