Case LawHigh Court › Ita/205/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/205/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax, Tvm v. The Kerala Automobiles Ltd. Tvm

High Court 23 May 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/205/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax, Tvm v. The Kerala Automobiles Ltd. Tvm
Date of order
23 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/205/2001 Of The Commissioner Of Incometax, Tvm v. The Kerala Automobiles Ltd. Tvm, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, these I.T.Appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 ITA.No. 205 of 2001() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03/07/2001 IN COCH. IN ITA.282/2000 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT / RESPONDENT -------------------- COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC FOR IT RESPONDENT(S): / APPELLANT --------------- THE KERALA AUTOMOBILES LTD., TRIVANDRUM - 695 123. ADV. . SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2011, ALONG WITH ITA NO.12/2002, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. ---------------------------------- I.T.A. Nos.205 of 2001 & 12 of 2002 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 23[rd] day of May, 2011J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. Question raised pertains to disallowance of interest under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act in Section 154 proceedings.However after going through the records and after hearing learnedcounsel appearing for both sides, we notice that the respondentCompany, which is under the control of State Government, is inheavy loss and the loss allowed by the Officer itself for one year isabove Rs.88 lakhs, which has gone up to above Rs.1.03 crores inthe succeeding year. Going by the trend and the loss allowed, wedo not think the Department can get any tax from the respondent inthe near future, even if appeal is allowed cancelling the smalldisallowances. Therefore, these I.T.Appeals are dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan