Case LawHigh Court › Ita/207/2001 Of (O&M) Commissioner Of In...

Ita/207/2001 Of (O&M) Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ldh v. M/S Steel Strips,Chd

High Court 30 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/207/2001 Of (O&M) Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ldh v. M/S Steel Strips,Chd
Date of order
30 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/207/2001 Of (O&M) Commissioner Of Income Tax,Ldh v. M/S Steel Strips,Chd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

4)?IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.207 of 2001Date of decision : 39.10.2019 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Ludhiana VerTSU ..... Appellant M/s. Steel Strips Limited, Chandigarh. ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MRS.JUSTICEALKA SARIN ,,, Present ;Ms.Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate and. Mr.Shantanu, Bansal, Advocate for the respondent.,,, AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) It has been brought to our notice that one of us (Ajay Tewari,J.) had been the counsel of the respondent-assessee but the counsel for theappellant has pointed out that she wishes to withdraw this case in lieu ofthe Circular of CBDT and therefore no disability attaches to Ajay Tewari,J. in allowing the withdrawal. We find this to be indeed so. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order of the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal Division Bench, Chandigarh in ITANo.212/Chand1/1993 dated 24.02.1995. 3. Learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue states thatsince the tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribedin Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.l7 of 2019 datedO08 08.2019 read with Letter No.k. No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated20.08.2019, she has instructions to withdraw the present appeal,However, she has prayed that liberty be granted to the Revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein. 4Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5.Since the main case has been decided, the pending CivilMisc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of| (AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE 30.10.2019ranidWhether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable | (ALKA SARIN)JUDGE Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan