Ita/208/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.c.p.david
High Court
14 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/208/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.c.p.david
Date of order
14 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/208/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.c.p.david, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
MONDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2010 / 24TH JYAISTHA 1932
ITA.No. 208 of 2010()
---------------------
IT(S & S) .A.22/COCH/2006 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT.
----------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOEM TAX (CENTRAL)
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT.
--------------------------
SHRI.C.P.DAVID,
REPRESENTED BY ;/H. SHRI.ARUN DAVID,
CHEMBAKOTTUKUDIYIL HOUSE, AYAKKAD, KOTHAMANGALAM.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 14/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 14th day of June, 2010
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The very same order of the Tribunal impugned in this case wasset aside by us and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal videjudgment judgment in I.T.A.No. 191 of 2010. Following the saidjudgment, we dispose of this Appeal by directing the Tribunal toconsider the issues raised by the revenue in this appeal while disposingof the appeal already remanded based on the direction issued in theabove judgment.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(P.S. GOPINATHAN)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.