Ita/208/2019 Of T.r.sadananda Bhat v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/208/2019 Of T.r.sadananda Bhat v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/208/2019 Of T.r.sadananda Bhat v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1942
ITA.No.206 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 413/2011 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT:
T.R.SADANANDA BHAT,AGED 65 YEARSPROPRIETOR, UNITED CARGO CARRIERS, FLAT NO.107, PANAMPILLY APARTMENTS, KOCHI-682 036,PAN -
RESPONDENT:
BY ADVS.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHANSHRI.TERRY V.JAMESSRI.SHARAN SHAHIER
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM-682 018
R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)
R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON05.03.2021, ALONG WITH ITA.208/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1942
ITA.No.208 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 414/2011 DATED 18-07-2013 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
APPELLANT/Appellant:
T.R.SADANANDA BHAT,AGED 65 YEARSPROPRIETOR, UNITED CARGO CARRIERS, FLAT NO.107, PANAMPILLY APARTMENTS, KOCHI-682036, PAN.ADMPB 6774F
BY ADVS.SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHANSHRI.TERRY V.JAMESSRI.SHARAN SHAHIER
RESPONDENT/Respondent:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM-682018
R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON05.03.2021, ALONG WITH ITA.206/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
[ ITA.206/2019, ITA.208/2019 ]Dated this the 5th day of March 2021S.V.Bhatti, J.
Assessee is the appellant. The instant Tax Appeals are filedaggrieved by the order dated 18.7.2013 in ITA Nos.413 &414/Coch/2011 for the assessment years 2005-06 & 2007-08. Theappeals were filed with a delay of 2029 days. On 2.3.2020, thedelay was condoned subject to the appellant paying cost of`10,000/- in each appeal to the Department within three weeksfrom 2.3.2020. The appeals were listed for admission on 28.1.2021and 22.2.2021. The appellant is unable to place before the Courtproof of payment of costs to the Department as directed by thisCourt on 2.3.2020.
We are of the view that the appellant is not serious inworking out the remedy in spite of this Court showing indulgence
and condoning the abnormal delay of 2029 days. Hence
Appeals fail. Dismissed. No order as to costs.
Sd/-S.V.BHATTIJUDGE
css/
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMASJUDGE
APPENDIX OF ITA 206/2019
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-ATRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED31.12.2009 OF THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,ERNAKULAM
ANNEXURE-BTRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 31.1.2011 OF THECOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III,KOCHI
APPENDIX OF ITA 208/2019
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 31.12.2009 OF THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM,
ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 31.1.2011 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) III, KOCHI.
ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF THE IMPUGNED COMMON ORDER DATED 18.7.2013 IN ITA NO.413 AND 414/COCH/2011 OF THE HON'BLE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.