Case LawHigh Court › Ita/209/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/209/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vanshee Builders And

High Court 22 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/209/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vanshee Builders And
Date of order
22 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/209/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vanshee Builders And, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF APRIL 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL|1LT.A. NO.209 OF 2013 BETWEEN: 1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. BANGALORE-IIL BANGALORE. 2.|INCOME TAX OFFICER| WARD 12(2), BANGALORE.| .... APPELLANTS (BY MR. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.,). AND: M/S. VANSHEE BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS P. LTD., NO.684, 9TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560034. ... RESPONDENT (BY MR. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W MR. RAVISHANKAR, ADV., FOR MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,) THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 2Z60-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.12.2012 PASSED|ITA NO.386/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09,|PRAYING TO. (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW.STATED THEREIN. (iil) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THEITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.386/BANG/2012 DATED 07.12.2012. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, | ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri. A. Shankar, learned Senior Counsel along with| Srl.Ravishankar,|learnedcounsel|for |Sri. M Lava, learned counsel for the assessee. Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned counsel for the)revenue. 2.|Tnis appeal under Section 260-A of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 has been field by the revenueagainst the order dated 07.12.2012 of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Bengaluru. | 3.When the matter was taken up today, learnedcounsel for the assessee submitted that the appeal maybe entertained in view of the circular dated 08.08.7019.issued by the Government of India, Department ofRevenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Judicial Sectionas in the instant case, it is less than Rupees One Crore. The aforesaid submission could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the revenue. | 4In view of the circular dated 08.08.2019, theappeal is dismissed on the ground of monetary limit. 4In view of the circular dated 08.08.2019, the Mds/-| Sd/-JUDGE JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan