Case LawHigh Court › Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corpor...

Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle , Panchkula

High Court 15 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle , Panchkula
Date of order
15 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle , Panchkula, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE(Oral) Learned counsel for the assessee-appellant, at the outset, states that these proceedings have been rendered infructuous, and thus, the appeal stands dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.209 of 2018 (O&M)Date of Decision °°15.05.201 Haryana Financial Corporation, Sector 17, Chandigarh ..--- Appellant 2!($3$ Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula wee RESpondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE Present :Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate withMr. Manpreet S. Kanda, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counselfor the Income Tax Department. KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE(Oral) Learned counsel for the assessee-appellant, at the outset, states that these proceedings have been rendered infructuous, and thus, the appeal stands dismissed as such. (KRISHNA MURARITCHIEF JUSTICE 15.05.2019Manoj Bhutani (ARUN PALLI)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasonedWhether reportable Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan