Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle , Panchkula
High Court
15 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle , Panchkula
Date of order
15 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/209/2018 Of Haryana Financial Corporation v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle , Panchkula, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE(Oral) Learned counsel for the assessee-appellant, at the outset, states that these proceedings have been rendered infructuous, and thus, the appeal stands dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.209 of 2018 (O&M)Date of Decision °°15.05.201
Haryana Financial Corporation, Sector 17, Chandigarh
..--- Appellant
2!($3$
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula Circle, Panchkula
wee RESpondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE
Present :Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate withMr. Manpreet S. Kanda, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Counselfor the Income Tax Department.
KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE(Oral)
Learned counsel for the assessee-appellant, at the outset, states
that these proceedings have been rendered infructuous, and thus, the appeal
stands dismissed as such.
(KRISHNA MURARITCHIEF JUSTICE
15.05.2019Manoj Bhutani
(ARUN PALLI)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.