Ita/209/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S July Systems
High Court
26 Mar 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/209/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S July Systems
Date of order
26 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/209/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. M/S July Systems, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in the memo.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
BETWEEN
I.T.A. NO.209/2019
1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE. BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE. CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SANMATHI E I, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S JULY SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD., # 17/9C, 17/4C, 4TH FLOOR, MARUTHI CHAMBERS, ROOPENA AGRAHARA, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560076 PAN :AABCB 6543 M (BY MS.SHREYA, ADVOCATE)
...RESPONDENT
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 31.10.2018 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH BANGALORE IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO.IT(TP)A
NO.479/BANG/2016 (ANNEXURE-A) FOR ASSESSMENT 2011-2012.
YEAR
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ms. Shreya, learned counsel has marked her presence for the respondent as Sri Chaithanya, learned counsel is no longer appearing for the respondent in the matter.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
praying for withdrawal of the appeal as the respondent has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme with liberty to seek revival, if need arises.
3. The memo is accepted.
4. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in the memo.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
TL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.