Ita/209/2021 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sree Lakshmi Venkateshwara Transport
High Court
15 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/209/2021 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sree Lakshmi Venkateshwara Transport
Date of order
15 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009, 2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/209/2021 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sree Lakshmi Venkateshwara Transport, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
I.T.A.No.209/2021
BETWEEN :
1 . THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING,
QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2 . THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1),
C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
SREE LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA TRANSPORT BELLARY ROAD CIRCLE, 21 WARD, HOSPET-583 201,
PAN:
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI A.SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI S.ANNAMALAI, ADV..)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30.09.2020 PASSED IN ITA NO.1813/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009, PRAYING TO A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS
PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, IN ITA NO.1813/BANG/2017 DATED 30.09.2020 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal, which reads thus;
“The Appellant in the above matter respectfully seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the above appeal in view of the monetary limit Circular no.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, the tax effect in the above appeal for AY 2008-09 is Rs.9,70,235/-. It is further submitted that without prejudice to similar issues pending in ITA 184/2021, 185/2021, 186/2021, 187/2021, 193/2021 and 194/2021 the above appeal may kindly be dismissed in view of Circular no.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 in the interest of justice and equity.”
The memo is placed on record.
The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.