Ita/211/2016 Of M/S K Mohan & Company v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Jun 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/211/2016 Of M/S K Mohan & Company v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2008-09, 2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/211/2016 Of M/S K Mohan & Company v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.211/2016 C/W INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.417/2015
IN ITA NO.211/2016:
BETWEEN:
M/S K MOHAN & COMPANY (EXPORTS) PVT. LTD., B1, 62-5, BEGUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 068, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR SMT. POOJA RAJU MAHTANEY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WIFE OF SRI RAJU MOHANDAS MAHTANEY.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.JINITA CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S PARTHASARATHI)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(5), 14/3, RASTROTHANA BHAVAN, 5TH FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS I.T.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 06/11/2015 PASSED IN M.P.NO.96/BANG/2015 ARISING OUT OF ITA NO.1057/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL BY INCLUDING THE PROFIT ON THE CANCELLATION OF FORWARD CONTRACT FOR CONSIDERING ELIGIBILITY FOR DEDUCTION U/S.10B OF THE ACT VIDE TRIBUNAL ORDER DT. 06.11.2015 IN M.P.NO.96/BANG/2015 ARISING OUT OF ITA NO.1057/BANG/2012 FOR ASST YEAR: 2008-09 ANNEXURE-‘A’.
IN ITA NO.417/2015:
BETWEEN:
M/S K MOHAN & COMPANY (EXPORTS) PVT. LTD., B1, 62-5, BEGUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 068, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR SRI RAJU M MAHTANEY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SON OF SRI MOHANDAS KUNDANMAL MAHTANEY.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.JINITA CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI S PARTHASARATHI)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(5), 14/3, RASTROTHANA BHAVAN, 5TH FLOOR, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
----
THIS I.T.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 24/04/2015 PASSED IN ITA NOS.1093/BANG/2009 AND 1266/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 AND 2007-08 (ANNEXURE-A) PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL
QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER OF THE ITAT BEARING ITA NOS.1093/BANG/2009 AND 1266/BANG/2010 FOR A.YRS:2006-07 AND 2007-08 DT: 24/04/2015 (ANNEXURE-A).
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Learned advocate for the appellants has filed a memo on 03.06.2022 seeking leave to withdraw these appeals.
2. Leave granted. Appeals are accordingly
dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.