Case LawHigh Court › Ita/211/2018 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Ita/211/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 03 v. Vasundra Promoters Pvt. Ltd

High Court 25 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/211/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 03 v. Vasundra Promoters Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
25 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/211/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 03 v. Vasundra Promoters Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Taking the statement on record, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the question of law framed on 14.5.2018 and leaving the issue/question of law raised open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 211/2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- 03 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate versus VASUNDRA PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R% 25.09.2018 CM Nos.6499-6500/2018 Applications for delay in filing and re-filing the appeal are allowed, as there is no opposition from the respondent/assessee. ITA 211/2018 Learned counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect in the present appeal is below Rs.50,00,000/- and hence, the substantial question of law framed vide order dated 14.5.2018 need not be answered and decided. The appeal may be treated as disposed of, leaving the issue open. Taking the statement on record, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the question of law framed on 14.5.2018 and leaving the issue/question of law raised open. We may record that the order dated 14.5.2018 did not admit the appeal on another issue raised by the Revenue. It is also stated at bar that the tax effect in the present appeal is below Rs.50,00,000/-, even if we count the tax payable on the issue on which question of law was not framed vide order dated 14.5.2018. SEPTEMBER 25, 2018/tp SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan