Case LawHigh Court › Ita/21/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/21/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. M/S Bd.yadav And Mr.meshram,Nagpur

High Court 20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Ita/21/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. M/S Bd.yadav And Mr.meshram,Nagpur
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/21/1993 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Nagpur v. M/S Bd.yadav And Mr.meshram,Nagpur, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDENAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPLICATION NOS.21 OF 1993 Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders ofdirections and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Applicant.CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. : 1.Income Tax Application No.20 of 1993 raising similar questions of law relating to AY 85-86 has already been allowed by us today. Since the statement of case relating to deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) relating to AY 85-86 has already been called by us, the present application which is also relating to deletion of penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) relating to AY 1985-86 is dismissed. Judge Judge. /agk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan