Ita/21/2002 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. The Tata Iron And Steel Co.ltd
High Court
12 Jun 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ita/21/2002 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. The Tata Iron And Steel Co.ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/21/2002 Of The Comm. Of Income Tax v. The Tata Iron And Steel Co.ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2002
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Applicant.
V/s.
The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kontangale for applicant.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi for respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel for the rival
parties. As far as the first question is concerned,
the Tribunal has relied upon the earlier order which
was in favour of the assessee. No material is placed
on record so as to show that any further action was
taken to set up a challenge to that order.
2. So far as the second question is concerned,
it is covered by the Judgment of this Court delivered
in the case Income Tax Reference No.95 of 1988 decided
on 4th July, 2005 in the case of The Commissioner of
Income Tax V/s. Tata Iron & Steel Bombay House
(unreported).
3. In the aforesaid view of the matter, no
substantial question of law arises in the application.
In the result, the application under consideration is
dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.