Ita/21/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Kolkata-Xvii v. Shri Arjun Bhowmick
High Court
05 Dec 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/21/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Kolkata-Xvii v. Shri Arjun Bhowmick
Date of order
05 Dec 2023
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/21/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Kolkata-Xvii v. Shri Arjun Bhowmick, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Learned standing counsel for the Income TaxDepartment/appellant states that in this case, the tax effectinvolved is less than the monetary limit for filing appeal asprescribed in Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 and,therefore, this appeal may be dismissed.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA/21/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-XVII
-Versus-SHRI ARJUN BHOWMICK
BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 5[th] December, 2023
Appearance:Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv....for the appellant.
The Court : This appeal relates to assessment year2006-07.
Learned standing counsel for the Income TaxDepartment/appellant states that in this case, the tax effectinvolved is less than the monetary limit for filing appeal asprescribed in Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 and,therefore, this appeal may be dismissed.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue