Ita/212/2010 Of Sri Mahesh Hasmukh Boriya v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
02 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/212/2010 Of Sri Mahesh Hasmukh Boriya v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/212/2010 Of Sri Mahesh Hasmukh Boriya v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF MARCH 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
I. T. A. NO.212 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
SRI. MAHESH HASMUKH BORIYA PROP. M/S TRANSCELL SOLUTIONS & SERVICES, NO.27/44, 9 MAIN, 3 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALORE -560 004, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O SRI HASMUKH JEEVRAJ BORIYA,
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(1) BENGALURU.
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
….RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 10.02.2010
PASSED IN ITA No.773/BNG/2009, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-2003, PRAYING TO i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT BANGALORE IN ITA No.773/BNG/2009, DATED 10.02.2010, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ms. Jinita Chatterjee, learned counsel for Mr. S.Parthasarathi, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the Revenue.
2. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
3. Aforesaid memo is taken on record. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the
same.
SD/- JUDGESD/- JUDGE
RD
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.