Ita/214/2001 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Kusum Maheshwari
High Court
11 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ita/214/2001 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Kusum Maheshwari
Date of order
11 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/214/2001 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Kusum Maheshwari, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant- Department seeks leave to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the taxeffect is less than the amount of Rs.20 lacs and in view of Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA2142001Decided on: 11.07.2016
Commissioner of [Income Ja(Central) Ludhiana |
$%&'('
..... Appellant
Smt. Kusum Maheshwary]
..... Respondent
CORAM-,./BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR,ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
-,./BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
PresentMr.Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate, with|
Mr.Divya Suri, Advocate, for the respondent.
;;;;;;;
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-
Department seeks leave to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the taxeffect is less than the amount of Rs.20 lacs and in view of Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015,
The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Needless to add that this order would not affect the rights andthe contentions of the parties on the questions of law or of fact in otherappropriate proceedings.
1 S.J. VAZIFDAR |
ACTING CHIEE JUSTICE
11.07.2016
| DEEPAK SIBAL |
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue