Ita/216/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Muninaga Reddy
High Court
17 Dec 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/216/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Muninaga Reddy
Date of order
17 Dec 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/216/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shri Muninaga Reddy, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATBD THIS THR 17 DAY OF DECEMBER, 20109
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK VINEBT SARAN|
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
ITA No. 216/2015
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX , C.R. BUILDINGS,
QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE. |
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -6(1),
RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN,NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,BANGALORE -560 OO1._ APPBRLLANTS)
(BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND & MS. PREETHI-J.D.-ADVs)
AND
SHRI. MUNINAGA REDDY,NO.409, B MAIN, 4 CROSS,* BLOCK, KALYAN NAGAR,BANGLAORE-560 043,PAN:ARLPR 57/36F.—. RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S.PARTHASARATHI & MS. JINITA CHATTERJEE-ADVs) |
THIS JTA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2J60A OF THEINCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER|PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO. 860/BANG/2012.DATED: 13.11.2015, ETC.,
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
VINEET SARAN J..DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue hasplaced before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated|10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes,wherein the monetary limit of the tax eftect for filing appealsbefore the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to |Rs.20 lacs.
In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has beenclarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending|appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may bewithdrawn/not pressed.
2.Learned counsel for the appellants has stated|that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specifiedlimit of Rs.20 lacs.
3.Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less|than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal standsdismissed.
TL
Sd/- |
JUDGE|
Sd/-.
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue