Case LawHigh Court › Ita/217/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/217/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Crane Software International Ltd

High Court 31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/217/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Crane Software International Ltd
Date of order
31 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/217/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Crane Software International Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 3l[ST|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE. THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.21/7 OF JOL BEI|WEEN 1.)THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBENGALURU D> |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCIRCLE-11(2)C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBENGALURU _.. APPELLANTS (BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR-SRI: K.V.ARAVIND, ADOVCATE) AND= M/S. CRANE SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL LTD., BLOCK-1* FLOOR SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDINGBENGALURU-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ALSSHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FORSRI. M.LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATED05.02.2011,PASSEDIN|LTA]NO.775/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO (ij) FORMULATETHE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN,(i) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS|PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,BENGALURUINLTA]NO.7/75/BANG/2010DATED08.02.7011 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE.COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(2), BENGALURU, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ANDEQUITY. AK AK THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR)HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit thatthe appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary.limits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (1TJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New| Delnl. 2).In view of the submission made, the appeal is Gismissed as sucn. Sd/-JUDGE *pgn/-— Sd/-JUDGE |
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan